Legal Responsibility of a Board Member: Grounds and Consequences, Relevant Questions, Judicial Practice, Cases

Introduction
A board member plays a key role in managing and making decisions that affect the company’s operations and financial well-being. In Estonia, board members bear both civil and criminal liability for their actions and decisions within the company. Legislation strictly regulates their duties and rights, and it provides serious consequences for violating established norms. In this article, we will examine what board member liability is, the grounds on which it arises, and what consequences it may have.

Grounds for Board Member Liability
In Estonia, the activities of board members are primarily regulated by the Commercial Code (Äriseadustik) and the Bankruptcy Act. The main duties of board members include:

  1. Duty of loyalty and good faith – Board members must act in the interests of the company, its shareholders, and clients. They are required to avoid conflicts of interest and not to abuse their position.
  2. Duty of care – Decisions must be made with due caution, as a reasonable entrepreneur would in a similar situation. It is important to follow standards of economic reasonableness and avoid excessive risks.
  3. Financial oversight – Board members are obliged to ensure accurate financial reporting and to fulfill all tax and other obligations to the state. Failure to meet these obligations can lead to serious consequences.
  4. Decision-making within authority – Board members must make decisions within their authority and act according to the company’s bylaws. Exceeding their authority may result in liability.
  5. Ensuring solvency – In the event of a threat to the company’s solvency, board members are obligated to take timely action to rescue the company. Failure to meet these obligations can lead to personal liability for the company’s debts.

Types of Liability

  1. Civil Liability
    A board member may be held civilly liable for damages caused to the company or third parties. If it is proven that a board member made a decision that resulted in financial harm to the company, they are obligated to compensate for the damages. A claim for damages can be filed by the company itself, its shareholders, or creditors.

Example: If the company incurs losses due to an unfavorable deal made by a board member, its shareholders may file a claim for compensation for those losses.

  • Criminal Liability
    Criminal liability arises in cases of actions that fall under the definition of economic crimes. This may include intentional bankruptcy, fraud, concealing financial information, embezzlement, or tax evasion.

Example: In the case of intentional bankruptcy, if a board member uses the company’s assets for personal gain or improperly diverts them, they may be subject to criminal liability.

  • Joint Liability
    If several board members jointly make a decision that causes harm, they may be held jointly liable. This means that each board member is equally responsible for the damages caused, regardless of who initiated the decision.

Example: In a situation where all board members agreed upon and approved a loss-making transaction, all participants of the board bear responsibility.

Consequences of Liability

  1. Financial Consequences
    A board member found guilty of causing damage to the company is required to compensate for the losses. This may involve damages caused to the company as well as claims from creditors. Financial liability can be significant and may affect personal assets.
  2. Criminal Penalties
    In cases of criminal offenses such as fraud or intentional bankruptcy, board members may be sentenced to imprisonment or significant fines. The court may also impose a ban on further participation in the management of companies for a certain period.
  3. Reputational Consequences
    Being held liable can seriously undermine a board member’s business reputation. This can affect their career in the future, as companies and investors are cautious about individuals involved in economic violations.
  4. Disqualification from Executive Positions
    In certain cases, the court may rule to prohibit a board member from holding executive positions in companies for a specified time.

How to Avoid Liability?
Board members should adhere to the following principles:

  • Document all key decisions – Keep minutes of meetings and maintain documents that justify the decisions made.
  • Consult with attorneys and auditors – Timely legal advice can help avoid mistakes and minimize risks.
  • Monitor financial indicators – It is important to keep an eye on the financial health of the company and take timely action in case of impending insolvency.
  • Conduct regular audits – This will help identify errors in time and prevent potential violations.

Conclusion
The responsibility of a board member is a serious legal and financial obligation that requires a high level of care and loyalty towards the company. Violating these obligations can lead to serious legal consequences, including criminal penalties, financial sanctions, and reputational damage. To avoid such consequences, board members must carefully approach their duties and ensure compliance with all legal norms.

Relevant Questions and Answers Regarding Board Member Liability

  1. What does board member liability include? Liability includes fulfilling management obligations in accordance with the law and the company’s bylaws.
  2. What are the main duties imposed on a board member? Key duties include acting in the interests of the company, maintaining financial discipline, and executing board decisions.
  3. Can a board member be held liable to the company’s creditors? Yes, if their actions have caused harm to the creditors by violating their obligations.
  4. What law regulates the liability of board members in Estonia? The primary regulatory act is the Commercial Code (Äriseadustik), along with several provisions of the Civil Code and the Criminal Code.
  5. Can a board member be held criminally liable? Yes, for example, for fraud, intentional bankruptcy, or other crimes related to the management of the company.
  6. What is the duty of loyalty and care? This is the obligation of a board member to act in good faith and with care, as a reasonable entrepreneur would in similar circumstances.
  7. What happens if a board member violates their duties? They may be held civilly liable and required to compensate for damages caused to the company or third parties.
  8. What is the procedure for holding a board member accountable? It is first necessary to prove the fact of violation of their duties and the resulting damages.
  9. What liability does a board member have for the company’s tax obligations? A board member may be liable for the company’s failure to pay taxes if it occurred due to their fault.
  10. Can a board member be held liable after leaving their position? Yes, liability can persist for actions taken during their tenure.
  11. Can the company demand compensation for damages from a board member? Yes, the company can file a claim for damages if it is proven that the board member violated their duties.
  12. What evidence is needed for holding someone accountable? This may include financial reports, witness testimonies, documents proving damages and wrongful actions.
  13. Does the company’s bankruptcy affect a board member’s liability? Yes, in cases of intentional or negligent bankruptcy, a board member may be held liable.
  14. What role does the auditor play in the accountability process? An auditor can identify violations in the company’s reporting and provide evidence.
  15. Can a board member avoid liability if they were unaware of the violations? Ignorance does not exempt them from liability if it results from negligence or failure to perform duties.
  16. How can a board member protect themselves from claims? It is important to document all decisions, follow the company bylaws, and consult with attorneys.
  17. What liability does a board member have towards shareholders? They must act in the interests of the company and shareholders and can be held liable for actions that harm the company.
  18. What happens if there are several members on the board, and who is responsible? Each board member is responsible for their actions. If violations occurred jointly, liability may be shared.
  19. What is collective liability of the board? This is the responsibility of all board members for decisions and actions taken, even if a specific member did not participate in making the decision.
  20. Can a board member be held liable for the company’s transactions? Yes, if it is proven that the transaction was detrimental to the company or contrary to its interests.
  21. How does the absence of financial control affect a board member’s liability? Failing to fulfill the duty of financial oversight may become grounds for liability.
  22. How to protect oneself from future claims? It is important to keep accurate records, follow laws, and conduct regular audits of the company.
  23. Can a board member conclude contracts on behalf of the company? Yes, but they must act within the authority granted by the company’s bylaws.
  24. Can a new board member be held liable for past violations? No, if violations occurred before their appointment, but they are obliged to report them.
  25. Can a board member appoint their deputies? This depends on the company’s bylaws, but generally, board members act personally.
  26. What role does judicial practice play in liability issues? Judicial decisions play an important role in shaping the application of law and determining the boundaries of liability.
  27. What liability does a board member have in the event of company liquidation? They must carry out the liquidation of the company in accordance with the law and may be held liable for violations.
  28. Can a company insure a board member’s liability? Yes, this is a common practice to protect against potential claims.
  29. Who has the right to file a claim against a board member? Claims can be filed by the company, its shareholders, or creditors.

Analysis of Judicial Practice Regarding the Liability of Board Members in Civil Matters

Key Findings from Judicial Practice

  1. Duty of Care and Loyalty
    The main cases of liability for board members involve violations of their duties to oversee financial operations and making economically unreasonable decisions. For example, in one case from the Supreme Court (case No. 3-2-1-129-15), it was established that a board member must strictly adhere to the standard of a prudent businessman. In this case, the court emphasized that liability arises if oversight duties are violated, leading to losses for the company.
  2. Liability for Causing Damages
    According to case No. 2-14-63272/138, the Supreme Court indicated that if losses to the company arose due to the fault of a board member, the latter is obligated to compensate for them. Liability occurs if a causal link between the violation and the damages is proven.
  3. Liability for Ineffective Transactions
    In several cases, such as case No. 3-2-1-9-16, issues regarding the conclusion of transactions that did not benefit the company were considered. The court established that when assessing the economic justification of a transaction, it is important to consider the benefits gained by the company as a result of the contract.
  4. Damage from Actions Beyond Authority
    If a board member makes decisions without consulting other board members or the board of directors, such actions may be considered a violation of their duties. Case No. 3-2-1-129-15, in particular, emphasizes the need for each board member to consider not only the economic feasibility but also the legal constraints established by the company’s bylaws.
  5. Uncertainty of Responsibility
    In case No. 2-21-16071/38, the court emphasized that in cases where it is unclear who is responsible for causing damages, such claims may be dismissed. The court noted that in the absence of evidence regarding the direct involvement of a board member in causing damages, the claim cannot be upheld.

Overall Conclusion
Judicial practice in Estonia confirms that the liability of board members is governed by strict standards of care and loyalty towards the company. The primary task of the board is to protect the interests of the company, and any violation of these duties—whether through entering into unprofitable transactions, insufficient control over financial activities, or acting beyond proper authority—can lead to legal consequences. To avoid liability, board members must make decisions with the utmost care and document all key actions in the management of the company.

Analysis of Judicial Practice Regarding the Liability of Board Members in Criminal Matters

Based on the judicial decisions presented in the materials, several key aspects regarding the criminal liability of board members in Estonia can be highlighted. The most important points of judicial practice emphasize the need for individual responsibility and the existence of factual grounds for holding board members criminally liable.

  1. Principle of Individual Responsibility
    According to the decision of the Supreme Court in case No. 4-17-1195/22, the criminal liability of a board member cannot be automatic. It is essential to prove the connection between their actions or inaction and the committed offense. The court noted that the liability of each board member must be individual, and mere membership on the board is not a sufficient basis for liability. It is necessary to demonstrate specific wrongdoing by that individual.
  2. Distribution of Duties and Its Impact on Liability
    Judicial practice demonstrates that even with the distribution of duties among board members, liability can be imposed on all members if they were aware of the violation but did not take measures to prevent it. In case No. 3-1-1-43-08, the court emphasized that each board member must monitor the fulfillment of common obligations and take active action if there are grounds for doubt. Thus, evasion of oversight or ignoring possible violations may also be grounds for liability.
  3. Liability for Inaction
    Court decisions also highlight the responsibility for inaction. In particular, in case No. 4-17-1195/22, the situation was examined where board members failed to ensure the filing of tax returns. The court indicated that inaction that leads to violations of laws or obligations of the company may be regarded as a criminal offense, and such actions should be qualified under criminal law.
  4. Conditions for Criminal Liability
    To hold a board member criminally liable, it is necessary to prove the elements of the crime, which include the fact of the offense, its illegality, and the presence of guilt. In case No. 3-1-1-19-07, the court stated that criminal liability arises only if all elements of the crime are present and established during judicial proceedings. This includes both active actions and criminal inaction by the board member.
  5. Role of Good Faith and Caution
    Courts emphasize that a board member is required to act in good faith and with caution. If they consciously make decisions that violate the law or ignore their obligations, this can lead to criminal liability. In case No. 3-1-1-43-08, the court highlights that the actions of board members must meet the standard of behavior expected of a reasonable entrepreneur.

Conclusions

  1. Individual Responsibility: Criminal liability of each board member requires evidence of their personal actions or inactions that led to the offense. Judicial practice indicates that automatic liability cannot occur solely on the basis of board membership.
  2. Distribution of Duties Does Not Exempt from Liability: If board members were aware or should have been aware of violations, they can still be held liable, even with a clear distribution of duties. All board members must oversee general management issues.
  3. Liability for Inaction: Failure of board members to fulfill their duties, which results in legal violations, may be treated as a crime. This especially concerns issues related to the failure to meet the company’s financial or tax obligations.
  4. Proof of Crime Elements: To impose criminal liability, all elements of the crime must be proven, including the presence of guilt and the illegality of actions.

Judicial practice in Estonia emphasizes the need for caution and good faith in the activities of board members, as well as the importance of actively fulfilling their duties. Violating these principles can lead to serious criminal consequences for board members.

Examples from Judicial Practice of the Attorney

Example 1: Negligence in Accounting Duties
A client, a former board member of a small trading company, approached attorney Ilya Zuev, accused of negligence regarding accounting duties. The accusation was based on the client’s failure to ensure proper bookkeeping, which led to significant tax issues and fines from tax authorities.
Attorney Zuev was able to demonstrate that his client was not directly responsible for bookkeeping since this task had been delegated to a professional accounting firm with which the company had a contract. Moreover, the attorney presented evidence that the client took reasonable steps to oversee the state of the reporting and relied on data provided by the accounting firm. The court accepted the defense’s arguments, and the client avoided liability for violations.

Example 2: Defense in Intentional Bankruptcy Case
Attorney Ilya Zuev was approached by a former board member of a company accused of intentional bankruptcy. The accusation was based on claims that the client had allegedly removed the company’s assets prior to bankruptcy. The attorney meticulously examined the financial documentation and proved that the client acted within the law, attempting to save the company from bankruptcy through the sale of assets at market price. The court accepted the defense’s arguments, and the client was acquitted, avoiding criminal liability.

Example 3: Defense in Fraud Case
Attorney Ilya Zuev defended a client accused of fraud in a real estate sale transaction. The client was accused of concealing information about the legal status of the property, allegedly leading to the buyer’s losses. Attorney Zuev proved that the client had not concealed information and that the buyer had been informed about the legal status during the contract signing stage. The court established the absence of a crime and the client was acquitted.

Conclusion

Criminal liability for board members may arise in cases of intentional actions or serious inaction that leads to legal violations, damages to the company, or evasion of tax payments. Examples from judicial practice and attorney Ilya Zuev’s practice demonstrate that successful defense in such cases is possible with a well-prepared position and evidence of the client’s good faith actions.
If you have questions regarding the liability of board members in Estonia, please contact attorney at law Ilya Zuev for consultation.